Well, I've got a great one line up -- for December of this year (it is May now if you are reading this sometime in the past). Another who said "sure, just follow-up with me in a month when I'm not so busy." More of the same. Lots of friendly, but very busy people.
The essence of the interviews is to ask the people the questions they would like to be asked and to let them give the answers they would like to give. I know, it is a softball's softball type of interview, but it is also a type of interview that often gets surprising answers (at least that is my experience in real life talking to people).
However, that leaves me without anyone for the week I put as my deadline to get an interview up.
So, I'm interviewing myself. I'm available this week.
What do you believe the gospel is?
- Faith in Jesus Christ and the atonement.
- Repentance and making the atonement real in our lives.
- The gift of the Holy Ghost.
34Now when the Pharisees heard that he had silenced the Sadducees, they assembled together. 35And one of them, an expert in religious law, asked him a question to test him: 36“Teacher, which commandment in the law is the greatest?” 37Jesus said to him, “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind.’ 38This is the first and greatest commandment. 39The second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ 40All the law and the prophets depend on these two commandments.”(And yes, I like the NET Bible, even own print copies of it. http://biblehub.com/net/matthew/22.htm)
What sermons (talks) or doctrines or church leaders made an impression on you?
When I was first at BYU working on my bachelor's degree (which I finished at CSULA) I heard Spencer W. Kimball speak. He talked about how following leaders blindly would lead you straight to hell, buttressed with Brigham Young quotes. That talk had a very strong impact on me, even now, I believe that:
"Those who talk of blind obedience may appear to know many things, but they do not understand the doctrines of the gospel."The second was hearing my father talk about when Spencer W. Kimball came through Newfoundland. He stopped and met with our branch.
When I was just a kid (like first or second grade), Spencer W. Kimball came through Newfoundland where my dad was stationed.
We had a sister who was trying to get her husband to shape up. She tried to enlist Elder Kimball’s help at that time as to how she could force him to do the right thing. As an apostle he told her to focus instead on patiently loving him. To put her family first and the love between the two of them first, even if it meant not attending meetings and not pushing him to improve. The advice made a big impression on my dad who was in the branch presidency and who had expected something different.I had a similar experience on my mission. A sister who had long been a member with a bitterly opposed husband asked my advice. The spirit pushed me strongly to tell her that the Church existed to support her family, her family did not exist to support the Church, and that she should put her husband and family's harmony and love first. Nothing else was important.She followed my advice. Amazingly (to me) he was reconciled to her and to her membership, before he died rather suddenly of a cancer that he had been unaware of.As for the couple that Elder Kimball had advised, years later my dad encountered the couple in the temple. They had been completely transformed.Obviously I do not expect that sort of thing to happen for everyone, or for even most people. But if families are forever, I think that what we should do is focus on loving and supporting each other, in patience and kindness.The other part of the visit was a very strong outpouring of the Spirit and a small miracle. Something that struck my father was that when he met people later, those who had treasured the moment and remembered it were all active. Those who were not had also lost the memory.
I understand you used to ...
I used to do a lot of things. For example, I started blogging on September 16, 1997. One thing that I was involved in was FARMS before it was FARMS and was just a desk in John Welch's office. Back then it was pretty much some reading lists and some photocopies of essays that were going out of print or about to be lost. When I hear people who say "everything FARMS has said is .[redacted harsh statements]..." I think back to reading Eliade and Campbell and Nibley and others and the broader scope of thinking that introduced me to.
I was also involved with FAIR as a founding board member. But apologetics tend to make me cranky, so I've stepped away from them. Too often there is the following pattern:
- [Other person] They've discovered "xyz." It is irrefutable, new and ... etc.
- [Me] Try to get enough details about xyz to figure out which of the several mutually exclusive xyzs they are talking about.
- [Other person] And it is all hard evidence. [still without enough details for me to figure out which version they are talking about].
- [Me] Probing (and trying to be gentle about it)
- [Other person] you aren't listening.
- [Me] Finally figure out which one they are talking about. Look up the details.
- often the details reflect huge jumps.
- often the "facts" behind the details have huge gaps or are inconsistent.
- [Other person] I don't care about that any more, what I really was trying to get to was "qrs."
- Rinse and repeat.
If you could give one piece of advice?
I'm not smart enough to do that. Maybe in a few more years when I have more wisdom.
Probably not the best example, but it will fill in the gap until I actually get an interview completed.